Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943291›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Validating a Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling (MITS) Method in Determining Cause of Death in Stillbirths and Neonates.

Naanlep Matthew Tanko, Ibrayimov Bakytkaly, Alpamys Issanov, Dimitri Poddighe, Milan Terzic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naanlep Matthew TankoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-1270-1886
Ibrayimov BakytkalyClinical Academic Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pathology and Genetics, University Medical Center, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan.
Alpamys IssanovDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan.
Dimitri PoddigheDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-9334
Milan TerzicDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-5154
National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health · KZNazarbayev University · KZUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Opportunity/Contract ID: OPP1180554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) remains the gold standard and a valuable technique for determining cause of death. It is a source of health statistics that can be used to measure health care services' quality, unraveling important information on disease processes, particularly in emerging and unknown diseases. It can also be a vital tool for medical education and biomedical research. However, autopsy rates have been declining globally. There is an urgent need to develop and validate alternative methods in different settings to provide reliable information on cause of death. In this study, we aimed to determine cause of death (KazCoDe) in neonates and infants using minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), and to compare these results with those of CDA. We conducted MITS and CDA sequentially on 24 deceased children at the Pathological Bureau of the Akimat of the city of Nur-Sultan. Clinical data of the study subjects were extracted from their clinical records. During both procedures, brain, liver and lung tissues were collected for pathological diagnosis. Fifteen (62.5%) and nine (37.5%) were stillbirths and neonates, respectively. Eight (33.3%) were females and 16 (66.7%) were males. MITS diagnosis of cause of death was concordant with CDA diagnosis in 83.3% out of the 24 cases when considering the immediate and underlying causes of death and reviewing all the clinical and laboratory test results as part of the diagnostic evaluation to arrive at a cause of death (ICD-PM). We concluded that MITS is a valuable and reliable method for cause of death diagnosis in stillbirths and neonates, which can contribute vital mortality statistics in children in the absence of CDA.

Indexed as

cause of deathMITSneonatesstillbirths

Identifiers

PMID34943291
PMCPMC8700338
OpenAlexW3216201757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.