Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943288›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparison of Heart Rate Feedback from Dry-Electrode ECG, 3-Lead ECG, and Pulse Oximetry during Newborn Resuscitation.

Siren Rettedal, Joar Eilevstjønn, Amalie Kibsgaard, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Hege Ersdal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immediate heart rate changes in late preterm infants receiving resuscitation in the delivery room.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siren RettedalDepartment of Paediatrics, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4305-141X
Joar EilevstjønnLaerdal Medical, 4002 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-2689
Amalie KibsgaardDepartment of Paediatrics, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.
Jan Terje KvaløyDepartment of Research, Section of Biostatistics, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.
Hege ErsdalFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOLaerdal (Norway) · NO

Funding

Laerdal Foundation (Safer Births Bundle, Safer Healthcare, Stavanger) 5007Stavanger University Hospital no grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of heart rate (HR) is essential during newborn resuscitation, and comparison of dry-electrode ECG technology to standard monitoring by 3-lead ECG and Pulse Oximetry (PO) is lacking.

methodsNeoBeat, ECG, and PO were applied to newborns resuscitated at birth. Resuscitations were video recorded, and HR was registered every second.

resultsDevice placement time from birth was median (quartiles) 6 (4, 18) seconds for NeoBeat versus 138 (97, 181) seconds for ECG and 152 (103, 216) seconds for PO. Time to first HR presentation from birth was 22 (13, 45) seconds for NeoBeat versus 171 (129, 239) seconds for ECG and 270 (185, 357) seconds for PO. Proportion of time with HR feedback from NeoBeat during resuscitation from birth was 85 (69, 93)%, from arrival at the resuscitation table 98 (85, 100)%, and during positive pressure ventilation 100 (95, 100)%. For ECG, these proportions were, 25 (0, 43)%, 28 (0, 56)%, and 33 (0, 66)% and for PO, 0 (0, 16)%, 0 (0, 16)%, and 0 (0, 18)%. All

conclusionsNeoBeat was faster to place, presented HR more rapidly, and provided feedback on HR for a larger proportion of time during ongoing resuscitation compared to 3-lead ECG and PO.

Indexed as

dry-electrode technologyECGelectrocardiogramheart rate assessmentheart rate monitoringNeoBeatneonatal resuscitationnewborn resuscitationPulse Oximetryresuscitation guidelines

Identifiers

PMID34943288
PMCPMC8700180
OpenAlexW3215804489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.