ArticleBrain sciences2021
Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature.
Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local application of otoprotective compounds other than sodium thiosulfate to prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss: a systematic review.Drug delivery · 2026Pooled it
- Is the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent gadoteric acid ototoxic?Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- A closed-head, rotational traumatic brain injury model demonstrates deficits in righting reflex, neurological function, and auditory brainstem responses in rats.Brain injury · 2026Article
- New Insight into Potential Otoprotective Effects of Lactoferrin: Is It Paradoxically Ototoxic? An Experimental Investigation.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Subclinical auditory dysfunction in a genetic rat model of childhood absence epilepsy.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Article
- Combined Effects of Low-Dose Kanamycin and Noise Exposure on Auditory Brainstem Response and Cochlear Microphonic Potential in Guinea Pigs.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Auditory Brainstem Responses of Two Rat Models of Autism: Environmental and Genetic Contributions to Autism-Like Auditory Function.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025Article
- Impact of repeated intranasal gentamicin irrigation on structure and function of the vestibular brainstem.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Progressive Ototoxicity of Baby Shampoo As An Antifog Agent: An Experimental Study.The journal of international advanced otology · 2025Article
- Noise-induced vestibular dysfunction in rats: longitudinal assessment using cVEMP and behavioral testing after low-frequency acoustic trauma.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Article
- Impact of repeated intranasal gentamicin irrigation on auditory brainstem evoked potentials in rats.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Auditory brainstem responses are resistant to pharmacological modulation in Sprague Dawley wild-type and Neurexin1α knockout rats.BMC neuroscience · 2024Article
- Revisiting the Chicken Auditory Brainstem Response: Frequency Specificity, Threshold Sensitivity, and Cross Species Comparison.Neuroscience insights · 2024Article
- Universal Recommendations on Planning and Performing the Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) with a Focus on Mice and Rats.Audiology research · 2023Article
- Sources of variability in auditory brainstem response thresholds in a mouse model of noise-induced hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Research in hearing science is accelerating, and a wealth of data concerning auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in various animal models is published in peer-reviewed journals every year. Recently, we reviewed studies using ABR measurements in tinnitus rat models. We found significant discrepancies in the outcomes of these studies, some due to different research approaches and others due to different methodologies. Thus, the present work aimed to collect comprehensive information on all factors influencing ABR recordings in rats and compile recommendations on ABR data reporting. A questionnaire with queries about animal husbandry, transfer, handling, and the exact test conditions before, during, and after ABR recordings was sent to 125 researchers who published the relevant studies between 2015 and 2021. Eighteen researchers provided detailed answers on factors related to ABR measurements. Based on the analysis of the returned questionnaires, we identified three domains reflecting animal-, equipment-, and experiment-dependent factors that might influence the ABR outcome, thus requiring reporting in published research. The analysis of survey results led to the compilation of recommendations for reporting ABR outcomes supported by a literature review. Following these recommendations should facilitate comparative and meta-analyses of ABR results provided by various research groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.