Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34942650›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2022

Distributed and Multifaceted Effects of Threat and Safety.

Dinavahi V P S Murty, Songtao Song, Kelly Morrow, Jongwan Kim, Kesong Hu, Luiz Pessoa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fear, anxiety, and the extended amygdala-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. A Shared Threat-Anticipation Circuit Is Dynamically Engaged at Different Moments by Certain and Uncertain Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Honest Reckoning With the Amygdala and Mental Illness.The American journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Threat and Bidirectional Valence Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Core.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dinavahi V P S MurtyUniversity of Maryland College Park, MD.
Songtao SongUniversity of Maryland College Park, MD.
Kelly MorrowUniversity of Maryland College Park, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-8816
Jongwan KimJeonbuk National University, South Korea.
Kesong HuLake Superior State University, Sault Ste. Marie, MI.
Luiz PessoaUniversity of Maryland College Park, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-4696-6903
University of Maryland, College Park · USJeonbuk National University · KRLake Superior State University · US

Funding

INTERACTION OF EMOTIONAL PERCEPTION AND VISUAL ATTENTIONR01MH071589 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PESSOA, LUIZ · 2004 to 2024
$8.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH071589NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present fMRI study, we examined how anxious apprehension is processed in the human brain. A central goal of the study was to test the prediction that a subset of brain regions would exhibit sustained response profiles during threat periods, including the anterior insula, a region implicated in anxiety disorders. A second important goal was to evaluate the responses in the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminals, regions that have been suggested to be involved in more transient and sustained threat, respectively. A total of 109 participants performed an experiment in which they encountered "threat" or "safe" trials lasting approximately 16 sec. During the former, they experienced zero to three highly unpleasant electrical stimulations, whereas in the latter, they experienced zero to three benign electrical stimulations (not perceived as unpleasant). The timing of the stimulation during trials was randomized, and as some trials contained no stimulation, stimulation delivery was uncertain. We contrasted responses during threat and safe trials that did not contain electrical stimulation, but only the potential that unpleasant (threat) or benign (safe) stimulation could occur. We employed Bayesian multilevel analysis to contrast responses to threat and safe trials in 85 brain regions implicated in threat processing. Our results revealed that the effect of anxious apprehension is distributed across the brain and that the temporal evolution of the responses is quite varied, including more transient and more sustained profiles, as well as signal increases and decreases with threat.

Indexed as

AmygdalaFearAnxietyBayes TheoremBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID34942650
PMCPMC8832158
OpenAlexW4205916828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.