Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941897›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Expert-enhanced machine learning for cardiac arrhythmia classification.

Sebastian Sager, Felix Bernhardt, Florian Kehrle, Maximilian Merkert, Andreas Potschka, Benjamin Meder, Hugo Katus, Eberhard Scholz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning in the detection and management of atrial fibrillation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian SagerDepartment of Mathematics, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-9075
Felix BernhardtDepartment of Mathematics, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Florian KehrleInformatics for Life, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maximilian MerkertInstitute of Optimization, Technical University Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7838-445X
Andreas PotschkaInstitute of Mathematics, Clausthal University of Technology, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany.
Benjamin MederInformatics for Life, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hugo KatusInformatics for Life, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eberhard ScholzInformatics for Life, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEClausthal University of Technology · DETechnische Universität Braunschweig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a new method for the classification task of distinguishing atrial fibrillation (AFib) from regular atrial tachycardias including atrial flutter (AFlu) based on a surface electrocardiogram (ECG). Recently, many approaches for an automatic classification of cardiac arrhythmia were proposed and to our knowledge none of them can distinguish between these two. We discuss reasons why deep learning may not yield satisfactory results for this task. We generate new and clinically interpretable features using mathematical optimization for subsequent use within a machine learning (ML) model. These features are generated from the same input data by solving an additional regression problem with complicated combinatorial substructures. The resultant can be seen as a novel machine learning model that incorporates expert knowledge on the pathophysiology of atrial flutter. Our approach achieves an unprecedented accuracy of 82.84% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.9, which classifies as "excellent" according to the classification indicator of diagnostic tests. One additional advantage of our approach is the inherent interpretability of the classification results. Our features give insight into a possibly occurring multilevel atrioventricular blocking mechanism, which may improve treatment decisions beyond the classification itself. Our research ideally complements existing textbook cardiac arrhythmia classification methods, which cannot provide a classification for the important case of AFib↔AFlu. The main contribution is the successful use of a novel mathematical model for multilevel atrioventricular block and optimization-driven inverse simulation to enhance machine learning for classification of the arguably most difficult cases in cardiac arrhythmia. A tailored Branch-and-Bound algorithm was implemented for the domain knowledge part, while standard algorithms such as Adam could be used for training.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacAtrial FibrillationAtrial FlutterElectrocardiographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID34941897
PMCPMC8699667
OpenAlexW4200309980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.