Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941884›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Integration of whole genome sequencing and transcriptomics reveals a complex picture of the reestablishment of insecticide resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles coluzzii.

Victoria A Ingham, Jacob A Tennessen, Eric R Lucas, Sara Elg, Henrietta Carrington Yates, Jessica Carson, Wamdaogo Moussa Guelbeogo, N'Fale Sagnon, Grant L Hughes, Eva Heinz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Synergistic action of different molecular mechanisms causes striking levels of insecticide resistance in the malaria vectorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Victoria A InghamVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5708-4741
Jacob A TennessenThe Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5015-4740
Eric R LucasVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3892-1668
Sara ElgVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4571-1650
Henrietta Carrington YatesVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jessica CarsonVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Wamdaogo Moussa GuelbeogoCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ougadougou, Burkina Faso.
N'Fale SagnonCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ougadougou, Burkina Faso.
Grant L HughesVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7567-7185
Eva HeinzVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4413-3756
Daniel E NeafseyThe Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Hilary RansonVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-8247

Funding

Viral Genomics: evolution, spread, and host interactionsU19AI110818 · NIAID · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SABETI, PARDIS CHRISTINE · 2014 to 2024
$66.5M
Medical Research Council MR/R024839/1NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insecticide resistance is a major threat to gains in malaria control, which have been stalling and potentially reversing since 2015. Studies into the causal mechanisms of insecticide resistance are painting an increasingly complicated picture, underlining the need to design and implement targeted studies on this phenotype. In this study, we compare three populations of the major malaria vector An. coluzzii: a susceptible and two resistant colonies with the same genetic background. The original colonised resistant population rapidly lost resistance over a 6-month period, a subset of this population was reselected with pyrethroids, and a third population of this colony that did not lose resistance was also available. The original resistant, susceptible and re-selected colonies were subject to RNAseq and whole genome sequencing, which identified a number of changes across the transcriptome and genome linked with resistance. Firstly, an increase in the expression of genes within the oxidative phosphorylation pathway were seen in both resistant populations compared to the susceptible control; this translated phenotypically through an increased respiratory rate, indicating that elevated metabolism is linked directly with resistance. Genome sequencing highlighted several blocks clearly associated with resistance, including the 2Rb inversion. Finally, changes in the microbiome profile were seen, indicating that the microbial composition may play a role in the resistance phenotype. Taken together, this study reveals a highly complicated phenotype in which multiple transcriptomic, genomic and microbiome changes combine to result in insecticide resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPyrethrinsRNA-SeqTranscriptomeWhole Genome SequencingInsecticidesPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID34941884
PMCPMC8741062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.