Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941859›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2021

Pet Ownership and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Kristel J Scoresby, Elizabeth B Strand, Zenithson Ng, Kathleen C Brown, Charles Robert Stilz, Kristen Strobel, Cristina S Barroso, Marcy Souza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristel J ScoresbyCollege of Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1399-8426
Elizabeth B StrandVeterinary Social Work, Colleges of Veterinary Medicine and Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Zenithson NgCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Kathleen C BrownDepartment of Public Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Charles Robert StilzCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1318-2133
Kristen StrobelCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Cristina S BarrosoDepartment of Public Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4354-9058
Marcy SouzaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Knoxville College · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Maddie's Fund 12345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pet ownership is the most common form of human-animal interaction, and anecdotally, pet ownership can lead to improved physical and mental health for owners. However, scant research is available validating these claims. This study aimed to review the recent peer reviewed literature to better describe the body of knowledge surrounding the relationship between pet ownership and mental health. A literature search was conducted in May 2020 using two databases to identify articles that met inclusion/exclusion criteria. After title review, abstract review, and then full article review, 54 articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 54 studies, 18 were conducted in the general population, 15 were conducted in an older adult population, eight were conducted in children and adolescents, nine focused on people with chronic disease, and four examined a specific unique population. Forty-one of the studies were cross-sectional, 11 were prospective longitudinal cohorts, and two were other study designs. For each of the articles, the impact of pet ownership on the mental health of owners was divided into four categories: positive impact (

Indexed as

human-animal bondhuman-animal interactionspet ownership mental health

Identifiers

PMID34941859
PMCPMC8705563
OpenAlexW4200360355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.