Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941790›Full record

ArticleToxics2021

Forensic Toxicological and Medico-Legal Evaluation in a Case of Incongruous Drug Administration in Terminal Cancer Patients.

Pascale Basilicata, Pasquale Giugliano, Giuseppe Vacchiano, Angela Simonelli, Rossella Guadagni, Angela Silvestre, Maria Pieri

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pascale BasilicataLegal Medicine Section, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Pasquale GiuglianoLegal Medicine Section, AORN "Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano" Caserta, 81100 Caserta, Italy.
Giuseppe VacchianoDepartment of Law, Economics and Mathematical Methods, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Angela SimonelliLegal Medicine Section, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Rossella GuadagniLegal Medicine Section, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Angela SilvestreLegal Medicine Section, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Maria PieriLegal Medicine Section, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4184-5718
University of Naples Federico II · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITUniversity of Sannio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most cases, palliative care is prescribed to adults diagnosed with cancer. The definition of the most suitable therapy for an effective sedation in terminal cancer patients still represents one of the most challenging goals in medical practice. Due to their poor health, the correct dosing of drugs used for deep palliative sedation in terminal cancer patients, often already on polypharmacological therapy, can be extremely complicated, also considering possible drug-to-drug interactions that could lead to an increased risk of overdose and/or incongruous administration with fatal outcomes. The case of a terminal cancer patient is presented, focusing on the "adequacy" of administered therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsA young male, affected by Ewing sarcoma, attending a palliative care at his own home, died soon after midazolam administration. Toxicological and histological analyses were performed on body fluids and organ fragments. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Morphological reliefs evidenced a neoplastic mass, composed of lobulated tissue with a lardy, pinkish-gray consistency, extending from the pleural surface to the lung parenchyma, also present at the sacrum region (S1-S5), at the anterior mediastinum level, occupying the entire left pleural cavity, and infiltrating the ipsilateral lung. Metastatic lesions diffused to rachis and lumbar structures. The brain presented edema and congestion. Toxicological analyses evidenced blood midazolam concentrations in the range of 0.931-1.690 µg/mL, while morphine was between 0.266 and 0.909 µg/mL. Death was attributed to cardiorespiratory depression because of a synergic action between morphine and midazolam. The pharmacological interaction between midazolam and morphine is discussed considering the clinical situation of the patient. The opportunity to proceed with midazolam administration is discussed starting from guidelines recommendation. Finally, professional liability outlines are highlighted.

Indexed as

deep sedationdrug interactionmidazolammorphinepalliative careterminal patient management

Identifiers

PMID34941790
PMCPMC8704381
OpenAlexW4200425796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.