Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941760›Full record

ReviewToxics2021

Genotoxicity of Mercury and Its Derivatives Demonstrated In Vitro and In Vivo in Human Populations Studies. Systematic Review.

Juana Sánchez-Alarcón, Mirta Milić, Lilia Patricia Bustamante-Montes, Keila Isaac-Olivé, Rafael Valencia-Quintana, Ninfa Ramírez-Durán

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Guardians under Siege: Exploring Pollution's Effects on Human Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Assessment of the Impact of Trace Essential Metals on Cancer Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Juana Sánchez-AlarcónDoctorado en Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la Conducta, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50180, Estado de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9105-0251
Mirta MilićMutagenesis Unit, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-7185
Lilia Patricia Bustamante-MontesDecanato de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 451293, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8529-9982
Keila Isaac-OlivéFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50180, Estado de México, Mexico.
Rafael Valencia-QuintanaCuerpo Académico Ambiente y Genética UATLX-CA-223, Laboratorio "Rafael Villalobos-Pietrini" de Toxicología Genómica y Química Ambiental, Facultad de Agrobiología, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Santa María Acuitlapilco 90120, Tlaxcala, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3396-7694
Ninfa Ramírez-DuránFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50180, Estado de México, Mexico.
Autonomous University of Tlaxcala · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MXInstitute for Medical Research and Occupational Health · HRUniversidad Autónoma de Guadalajara · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beside partial coverage in three reviews so far (1994, 2009, 2019), there is no review on genotoxic studies dealing with mercury (Hg) and human exposure using the most usual genotoxic assays: sister chromatid exchanges (SCE), chromosomal aberrations (CA), cytochalasin B blocked micronucleus assay (CBMN), and single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE or alkaline comet assay). Fifty years from the first Hg genotoxicity study and with the Minamata Convention in force, the genotoxic potential of Hg and its derivatives is still controversial. Considering these antecedents, we present this first systematic literature overview of genotoxic studies dealing with Hg and human exposure that used the standard genotoxic assays. To date, there is not sufficient evidence for Hg human carcinogen classification, so the new data collections can be of great help. A review was made of the studies available (those published before the end of October 2021 on PubMed or Web of Science in English or Spanish language) in the scientific literature dealing with genotoxic assays and human sample exposure ex vivo, in vivo, and in vitro. Results from a total of 66 articles selected are presented. Organic (o)Hg compounds were more toxic than inorganic and/or elemental ones, without ruling out that all represent a risk. The most studied inorganic (i)Hg compounds in populations exposed accidentally, occupationally, or iatrogenically, and/or in human cells, were Hg chloride and Hg nitrate and of the organic compounds, were methylmercury, thimerosal, methylmercury chloride, phenylmercuric acetate, and methylmercury hydroxide.

Indexed as

chromosomal aberrationscomet assaymicronucleus assaysister chromatid exchange

Identifiers

PMID34941760
PMCPMC8704886
OpenAlexW3217105407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.