Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941665›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2021

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Sylvatic Rabies among High-Risk Households in Ceará State, Brazil.

Naylê Francelino Holanda Duarte, Patrícia Pereira Lima Barbosa, Danielle Bastos Araujo, Silvana Regina Favoretto, Phyllis Catharina Romijn, Raphael William Pontes Neres, Raquel Holanda Varela, Walber Feijó de Oliveira, Carlos Henrique Alencar, Jorg Heukelbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Naylê Francelino Holanda DuartePostgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-140, CE, Brazil.
Patrícia Pereira Lima BarbosaPostgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-140, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2863-0787
Danielle Bastos AraujoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil.
Silvana Regina FavorettoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil.
Phyllis Catharina RomijnAgricultural Research Institute of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 24120-191, RJ, Brazil.
Raphael William Pontes NeresSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Ceará State University, Fortaleza 60714-903, CE, Brazil.
Raquel Holanda VarelaDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60440-900, CE, Brazil.
Walber Feijó de OliveiraBrazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, Wild Animal Sorting Center, Fortaleza 60843-150, CE, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique AlencarPostgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-140, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2967-532X
Jorg HeukelbachPostgraduate Program in Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-140, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7845-5510
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRBrazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Estadual do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies transmitted by sylvatic populations has become an increasing concern in Brazil. A total of 113 participants with a history of contact with sylvatic populations were interviewed in 27 municipalities of Ceará State in northeast Brazil. Questionnaires included questions on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding sylvatic rabies. Most of the respondents (92%) knew about rabies and confirmed at least one species that transmitted the disease (79.6%). Of these respondents, 69% mentioned monkeys, and 67.2% mentioned dogs. However, 16% of the respondents listed an incorrect species. In general, knowledge on the symptoms and signs and on prevention measures was weak. The majority raised pets (93.8%), most commonly dogs and cats, and, of all the pets, 85.7% were claimed to be vaccinated against rabies. A total of 67.3% reported the appearance of free-living wild animals around their houses, mostly marmosets and wild canids; 18.3% reported that sylvatic populations had attacked animals or humans. Seventy-three percent had raised or still were raising wild animals as pets, mostly capuchin monkeys (79.5%) and marmosets (24.1%). This is the first KAP study on sylvatic rabies in Brazil. The data indicate important knowledge gaps and risk behavior within a high-risk population. There is a need for strengthening and improving sylvatic rabies surveillance and control, combined with the intensification of education and information campaigns.

Indexed as

animalsBrazilcapuchin monkeymarmosetrabiesraising domestic animalswild

Identifiers

PMID34941665
PMCPMC8707799
OpenAlexW4200325390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.