Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941649›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2021

Degradation-Aware Deep Learning Framework for Sparse-View CT Reconstruction.

Chang Sun, Yitong Liu, Hongwen Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chang SunScience of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7039-889X
Yitong LiuScience of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China.
Hongwen YangScience of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sparse-view CT reconstruction is a fundamental task in computed tomography to overcome undesired artifacts and recover the details of textual structure in degraded CT images. Recently, many deep learning-based networks have achieved desirable performances compared to iterative reconstruction algorithms. However, the performance of these methods may severely deteriorate when the degradation strength of the test image is not consistent with that of the training dataset. In addition, these methods do not pay enough attention to the characteristics of different degradation levels, so solely extending the training dataset with multiple degraded images is also not effective. Although training plentiful models in terms of each degradation level can mitigate this problem, extensive parameter storage is involved. Accordingly, in this paper, we focused on sparse-view CT reconstruction for multiple degradation levels. We propose a single degradation-aware deep learning framework to predict clear CT images by understanding the disparity of degradation in both the frequency domain and image domain. The dual-domain procedure can perform particular operations at different degradation levels in frequency component recovery and spatial details reconstruction. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM) and visual results demonstrate that our method outperformed the classical deep learning-based reconstruction methods in terms of effectiveness and scalability.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArtifactsSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray Computeddeep learningdegradation-awarefrequency domainimage domainsparse-view CT reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID34941649
PMCPMC8704775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.