Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941630›Full record

ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Secondary Use of Data to Support Medication Safety in the Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Navila Talib Chaudhry, Bryony Dean Franklin, Salmaan Mohammed, Jonathan Benn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tackling medication errors: how a systems approach improves patient safety.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Navila Talib ChaudhryResearch Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
Bryony Dean FranklinResearch Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-1245
Salmaan MohammedNIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Wright Fleming Building, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.
Jonathan BennNIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

Funding

Health Foundation Not applicableNational Institute for Health Research Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of interventions based on secondary use of data (SUD) from electronic prescribing (EP) and electronic hospital pharmacy (EHP) systems and their effectiveness in secondary care, and to identify factors influencing SUD.

methodThe search strategy had four facets: 1. Electronic databases, 2. Medication safety, 3. Hospitals and quality/safety, and 4. SUD. Searches were conducted within EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. Empirical SUD intervention studies that aimed to improve medication safety and/or quality, and any studies providing insight into factors affecting SUD were included.

resultsWe identified nine quantitative studies of SUD interventions and five qualitative studies. SUD interventions were complex and fell into four categories, with 'provision of feedback' the most common. While heterogeneous, the majority of quantitative studies reported positive findings in improving medication safety but little detail was provided on the interventions implemented. The five qualitative studies collectively provide an overview of the SUD process, which typically comprised nine steps from data identification to analysis. Factors influencing the SUD process were electronic systems implementation and level of functionality, knowledge and skills of SUD users, organisational context, and policies around data reuse and security. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe majority of the SUD interventions were successful in improving medication safety, however, what contributes to this success needs further exploration. From synthesis of research evidence in this review, an integrative framework was developed to describe the processes, mechanisms, and barriers for effective SUD.

Indexed as

electronic systemshospitalmedication safetyquality improvementsecondary use of data

Identifiers

PMID34941630
PMCPMC8706071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.