Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941555›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Characterizing and Identifying the Prevalence of Web-Based Misinformation Relating to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: Machine Learning Approach.

Mai ElSherief, Steven A Sumner, Christopher M Jones, Royal K Law, Akadia Kacha-Ochana, Lyna Shieber, LeShaundra Cordier, Kelly Holton, Munmun De Choudhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Large-Scale Analysis of Online Questions Related to Opioid Use Disorder on Reddit.Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Investigating Substance Use via Reddit: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  16. Identifying and Characterizing Medical Advice-Seekers on a Social Media Forum for Buprenorphine Use.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mai ElSheriefUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-5201
Steven A SumnerOffice of Strategy and Innovation, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3805-7235
Christopher M JonesNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-2100
Royal K LawDivision of Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5746-5373
Akadia Kacha-OchanaOffice of Strategy and Innovation, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-5098
Lyna ShieberBrunet-García, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6774-5854
LeShaundra CordierBrunet-García, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2095-6459
Kelly HoltonNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2550-3053
Munmun De ChoudhurySchool of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8939-264X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanding access to and use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is a key component of overdose prevention. An important barrier to the uptake of MOUD is exposure to inaccurate and potentially harmful health misinformation on social media or web-based forums where individuals commonly seek information. There is a significant need to devise computational techniques to describe the prevalence of web-based health misinformation related to MOUD to facilitate mitigation efforts.

objectiveBy adopting a multidisciplinary, mixed methods strategy, this paper aims to present machine learning and natural language analysis approaches to identify the characteristics and prevalence of web-based misinformation related to MOUD to inform future prevention, treatment, and response efforts.

methodsThe team harnessed public social media posts and comments in the English language from Twitter (6,365,245 posts), YouTube (99,386 posts), Reddit (13,483,419 posts), and Drugs-Forum (5549 posts). Leveraging public health expert annotations on a sample of 2400 of these social media posts that were found to be semantically most similar to a variety of prevailing opioid use disorder-related myths based on representational learning, the team developed a supervised machine learning classifier. This classifier identified whether a post's language promoted one of the leading myths challenging addiction treatment: that the use of agonist therapy for MOUD is simply replacing one drug with another. Platform-level prevalence was calculated thereafter by machine labeling all unannotated posts with the classifier and noting the proportion of myth-indicative posts over all posts.

resultsOur results demonstrate promise in identifying social media postings that center on treatment myths about opioid use disorder with an accuracy of 91% and an area under the curve of 0.9, including how these discussions vary across platforms in terms of prevalence and linguistic characteristics, with the lowest prevalence on web-based health communities such as Reddit and Drugs-Forum and the highest on Twitter. Specifically, the prevalence of the stated MOUD myth ranged from 0.4% on web-based health communities to 0.9% on Twitter.

conclusionsThis work provides one of the first large-scale assessments of a key MOUD-related myth across multiple social media platforms and highlights the feasibility and importance of ongoing assessment of health misinformation related to addiction treatment.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersSocial MediaCommunicationHumansMachine LearningPrevalenceaddiction treatmentmachine learningmisinformationnatural language processingopioid use disordersocial mediasubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34941555
PMCPMC8734931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.