Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941546›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Electronic Health Record Implementations and Insufficient Training Endanger Nurses' Well-being: Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Tarja Heponiemi, Kia Gluschkoff, Tuulikki Vehko, Anu-Marja Kaihlanen, Kaija Saranto, Sari Nissinen, Janna Nadav, Sari Kujala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tarja HeponiemiFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8540-049X
Kia GluschkoffFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0340-4209
Tuulikki VehkoFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0034-8379
Anu-Marja KaihlanenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4033-3673
Kaija SarantoUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-1955
Sari NissinenUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8696-434X
Janna NadavFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-3480
Sari KujalaAalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5586-3725
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIAalto University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh expectations have been set for the implementations of health information systems (HIS) in health care. However, nurses have been dissatisfied after implementations of HIS. In particular, poorly functioning electronic health records (EHRs) have been found to induce stress and cognitive workload. Moreover, the need to learn new systems may require considerable effort from nurses. Thus, EHR implementations may have an effect on the well-being of nurses.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the associations of EHR-to-EHR implementations and the sufficiency of related training with perceived stress related to information systems (SRIS), time pressure, and cognitive failures among registered nurses. Moreover, we examined the moderating effect of the employment sector (hospital, primary care, social services, and others) on these associations.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional survey study of 3610 registered Finnish nurses in 2020. EHR implementation was measured by assessing whether the work unit of each respondent had implemented or will implement a new EHR (1) within the last 6 months, (2) within the last 12 months, (3) in the next 12 months, and (4) at no point within the last 12 months or in the forthcoming 12 months. The associations were examined using analyses of covariance adjusted for age, gender, and employment sector.

resultsThe highest levels of SRIS (adjusted mean 4.07, SE 0.05) and time pressure (adjusted mean 4.55, SE 0.06) were observed among those who had experienced an EHR implementation within the last 6 months. The lowest levels of SRIS (adjusted mean 3.26, SE 0.04), time pressure (adjusted mean 4.41, SE 0.05), and cognitive failures (adjusted mean 1.84, SE 0.02) were observed among those who did not experience any completed or forthcoming implementations within 12 months. Nurses who perceived that they had received sufficient implementation-related training experienced less SRIS (F

conclusionsEHR implementations and insufficient training related to these implementations may endanger the well-being of nurses and even lead to errors. Thus, it is extremely important for organizations to offer comprehensive training before, during, and after implementations. Moreover, easy-to-use systems that allow transition periods, a re-engineering approach, and user involvement may be beneficial to nurses in the implementation process. Training and other improvements would be especially important in hospitals.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsNursesCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsHumansSurveys and Questionnairescognitive failureselectronic health recordsimplementationinformation systemsregistered nursesstresstime pressuretraining

Identifiers

PMID34941546
PMCPMC8738988
OpenAlexW3213755440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.