Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941542›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Investigating the Implementation of SMS and Mobile Messaging in Population Screening (the SIPS Study): Protocol for a Delphi Study.

Amish Acharya, Gaby Judah, Hutan Ashrafian, Viknesh Sounderajah, Nick Johnstone-Waddell, Anne Stevenson, Ara Darzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amish Acharya *Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2908-5944
Gaby JudahInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3322-9760
Hutan AshrafianInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-0672
Viknesh SounderajahInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-8402
Nick Johnstone-WaddellPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-3343
Anne StevensonPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-9851
Ara DarziInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7815-7989

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_18032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of mobile messaging, including SMS, and web-based messaging in health care has grown significantly. Using messaging to facilitate patient communication has been advocated in several circumstances, including population screening. These programs, however, pose unique challenges to mobile communication, as messaging is often sent from a central hub to a diverse population with differing needs. Despite this, there is a paucity of robust frameworks to guide implementation.

objectiveThe aim of this protocol is to describe the methods that will be used to develop a guide for the principles of use of mobile messaging for population screening programs in England.

methodsThis modified Delphi study will be conducted in two parts: evidence synthesis and consensus generation. The former will include a review of literature published from January 1, 2000, to October 1, 2021. This will elicit key themes to inform an online scoping questionnaire posed to a group of experts from academia, clinical medicine, industry, and public health. Thematic analysis of free-text responses by two independent authors will elicit items to be used during consensus generation. Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement groups will be convened to ensure that a comprehensive item list is generated that represents the public's perspective. Each item will then be anonymously voted on by experts as to its importance and feasibility of implementation in screening during three rounds of a Delphi process. Consensus will be defined a priori at 70%, with items considered important and feasible being eligible for inclusion in the final recommendation. A list of desirable items (ie, important but not currently feasible) will be developed to guide future work.

resultsThe Institutional Review Board at Imperial College London has granted ethical approval for this study (reference 20IC6088). Results are expected to involve a list of recommendations to screening services, with findings being made available to screening services through Public Health England. This study will, thus, provide a formal guideline for the use of mobile messaging in screening services and will provide future directions in this field.

conclusionsThe use of mobile messaging has grown significantly across health care services, especially given the COVID-19 pandemic, but its implementation in screening programs remains challenging. This modified Delphi approach with leading experts will provide invaluable insights into facilitating the incorporation of messaging into these programs and will create awareness of future developments in this area. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/32660.

Indexed as

digital communicationimplementationmobile messagingpopulation screeningSMS

Identifiers

PMID34941542
PMCPMC8734915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.