Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941438›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2022

In vivo assessment of the passive stretching response of the bicompartmental human semitendinosus muscle using shear-wave elastography.

Adam Kositsky, David J Saxby, Kim J Lesch, Rod S Barrett, Heikki Kröger, Olli Lahtinen, Laura E Diamond, Rami K Korhonen, Lauri Stenroth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adam KositskyGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9722-6628
David J SaxbyGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-7518
Kim J LeschSports and Exercise Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7389-0177
Rod S BarrettGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1784-1629
Heikki KrögerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4245-8186
Olli LahtinenDiagnostic Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-475X
Laura E DiamondGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2197-1856
Rami K KorhonenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3486-7855
Lauri StenrothDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7705-9188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The semitendinosus muscle contains distinct proximal and distal compartments arranged anatomically in series but separated by a tendinous inscription, with each compartment innervated by separate nerve branches. Although extensively investigated in other mammals, compartment-specific mechanical properties within the human semitendinosus have scarcely been assessed in vivo. Experimental data obtained during muscle-tendon unit stretching (e.g., slack angle) can also be used to validate and/or improve musculoskeletal model estimates of semitendinosus muscle force. The purpose of this study was to investigate the passive stretching response of proximal and distal human semitendinosus compartments to distal (knee) joint extension. Using two-dimensional shear-wave elastography, we bilaterally obtained shear moduli of both semitendinosus compartments from 14 prone-positioned individuals at 10 knee flexion angles [from 90° to 0° (full extension) at 10° intervals]. Passive muscle mechanical characteristics (slack angle, slack shear modulus, and the slope of the increase in shear modulus) were determined for each semitendinosus compartment by fitting a piecewise exponential model to the shear modulus-joint angle data. We found no differences between compartments or legs for slack angle, slack shear modulus, or the slope of the increase in shear modulus. We also found that the experimentally determined slack angle occurred at ∼15°-80° higher knee flexion angles compared with estimates from two commonly used musculoskeletal models, depending on participant and model used. Overall, these findings demonstrate that passive shear modulus-joint angle curves do not differ between proximal and distal human semitendinosus compartments and provide experimental data to improve semitendinosus force estimates derived from musculoskeletal models.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesHamstring MusclesMuscle Stretching ExercisesHumansMuscle, SkeletalTendonsforcehamstringsmechanical propertiesmusculoskeletal modelingslack angle

Identifiers

PMID34941438
PMCPMC8799393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.