Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34941136›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in the population of Argentina.

María Beatriz Lucuix, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Myriam E Barone, Sara Domínguez-Salas, Leticia Elizabeth Luque, Carmen Rodríguez-Domínguez, Carlos Ruiz-Frutos

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

María Beatriz LucuixSocial Work Career, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Myriam E BaroneInstituto de Estudios Sociales y Humanos, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Argentina.
Sara Domínguez-SalasDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.
Leticia Elizabeth LuqueFaculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Carmen Rodríguez-DomínguezDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.
Carlos Ruiz-FrutosDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Universidad de Huelva · ESUniversidad Loyola Andalucía · ESNational University of Misiones · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractIn addition to the implications that this pandemic has had on physical health, there are other circumstances that threaten the mental health of the population, such as lockdown measures to prevent the spread of the virus, uncertainty, and the increase in infections and deaths. For this reason, this study explored indicators of psychological distress in the Argentine population, as well as its relationship with sociodemographic and health variables.Cross-sectional observational study, with data collection from May to August 2020. A total of 1112 people over the age of 18 who responded to various measurement instruments through an online questionnaire participated. A bivariate analysis and logistic regression were carried out in order to determine predictive factors of psychological distress.The data revealed that 60.9% of the sample presented psychological distress. A greater number with this condition was observed in women, apart from younger people, with a greater number of symptoms associated with the disease and with worse self-perceived health. There was no evidence of association between psychological distress and contact with people infected with coronavirus disease 2019 or with material suspicious of being infected.This research provided an overview of the mental health status of a significant population sample in Argentina, months after the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. These findings complement those found in other national and international studies, allowing the accumulation of evidence that states the need to demand to draw attention to the mental health of the population, especially the most vulnerable groups, on behalf of the public authorities.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsPsychological DistressAdultArgentinaCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID34941136
PMCPMC8701755
OpenAlexW4200262396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.