Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34940931›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

An effective fine grading method of BI-RADS classification in mammography.

Fei Lin, Hang Sun, Lu Han, Jing Li, Nan Bao, Hong Li, Jing Chen, Shi Zhou, Tao Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fei Lin *College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Hang Sun *College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Lu HanDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Nan BaoCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Hong LiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China. lihong@bmie.neu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-8841
Jing ChenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Shi ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Tao YuDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China. yutao@cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com.
Northeastern University · CNGuiyang Medical University · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

2017 young and middle-aged scientific and technological innovation talent support plan RC170497Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities N2119003Guiyang Science and Technology Plan [2017] 30-34Guizhou Science and Technology Department No.Qiankehezhicheng[2019] 2794National Natural Science Foundation of China 61701103Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2019-ZD-0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMammography is an important imaging technique for the detection of early breast cancer. Doctors classify mammograms as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS). This study aims to provide an intelligent BI-RADS grading prediction method, which can help radiologists and clinicians to distinguish the most challenging 4A, 4B, and 4C cases in mammography.

methodsFirstly, the breast region, the lesion region, and the corresponding region in the contralateral breast were extracted. Four categories of features were extracted from the original images and the images after the wavelet transform. Secondly, an optimized sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) was used for feature selection. Finally, a two-layer classifier integration was employed for fine grading prediction. 45 cases from the hospital and 500 cases from Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) database were used for evaluation.

resultsThe classification performance of the support vector machine (SVM), Bayes, and random forest is very close on the 45 testing set, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.978, 0.967, and 0.968. On the DDSM set, the AUC achieves 0.931, 0.938, and 0.874. Using the mean probability prediction, the AUC on the two datasets reaches 0.998 and 0.916. However, they are all significantly higher than the doctors' diagnosis, with the AUC of 0.807 and 0.725.

conclusionsA BI-RADS fine grading (2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, 5) prediction model was proposed. Through the evaluation from different datasets, the performance is proved higher than that of the doctors, which may provide great help for clinical BI-RADS classification diagnosis. Therefore, our method can produce more effective and reliable results.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyBayes TheoremBreastEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansBI-RADS classificationClassifier integrationFine gradingMammography

Identifiers

PMID34940931
OpenAlexW4200527616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.