ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2022
[Latest findings from the RABBIT register].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2001 rheumatologists throughout Germany have been recruiting patients with rheumatoid arthritis into the biologics register (rheumatoid arthritis: observation of biologics treatment, RABBIT) to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of modern antirheumatic treatment. Over the past 20 years more than 20,000 patients have been enrolled in the prospective cohort study. This article summarizes the research findings published in 2020/2021, focusing on safety aspects, factors influencing treatment efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. With herpes zoster, facial nerve palsy and psoriasis, several adverse events were investigated that were either reported as a safety signal from clinical trials or through the EudraVigilance database or occurred as a paradoxical reaction under drug treatment. For these events, the influence of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment was analyzed. In the publication on herpes zoster, we also considered drug treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors. Severe overweight can influence the success of treatment. There are gender-specific differences and the mode of action of a treatment also determines whether obesity reduces the response to treatment. The majority of patients observed in RABBIT were satisfied with the treatment they have received after 1 year. We were able to show which factors either favor or negatively influence satisfaction with the effectiveness and safety of the treatment. This review article shows that long-term observational studies such as the RABBIT register contribute to the understanding of treatment risks and can identify factors that influence the effects of treatment even after two decades of data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.