Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34940863›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Feasibility and Accuracy of Menstrual Blood Testing for High-risk Human Papillomavirus Detection With Capture Sequencing.

Jingjing Zhang, Xun Tian, Ye Chen, Sisi Huang, Zifeng Cui, Rui Tian, Zhen Zeng, Wenjia Liang, Qifen Gong, Ronghua Shang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolving HPV diagnostics: current practice and future frontiers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jingjing ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xun TianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ye ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sisi HuangMedical Examination Center, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zifeng CuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Rui TianCenter for Translational Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhen ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wenjia LiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qifen GongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ronghua ShangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zheng HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician Expert Workstation, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Central Hospital of Wuhan · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) persistent infection is the major etiology of cervical precancer and cancer. Noninvasive self-sampling HPV testing is a promising alternative cervical cancer screening for avoiding stigma and improving patient willingness to participate. Objective: To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of menstrual blood (MB) hrHPV capture sequencing in hrHPV detection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study collected 137 sanitary pads from 120 women who were premenopausal and had hrHPV as detected by cervical HPV GenoArray testing. Patients were recruited from September 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021, at Central Hospital of Wuhan, China. Target capture sequencing was performed to determine hrHPV genotypes in MB. Sanger sequencing was performed as the criterion standard for detecting hrHPV genotypes among enrolled women. Data were analyzed from April 1 through June 1, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Complete concordance, incomplete concordance, and discordance of MB hrHPV capture sequencing and conventional HPV testing were defined according to genotype overlapping levels. Concordance of the 2 detection methods and comparative power of MB hrHPV capture sequencing during different menstrual cycle days (MCDs) were the main outcomes. Results: A total of 120 enrolled women with hrHPV (mean [SD; range] age, 33.9 [6.9; 20.0 -52.0] years) provided 137 sanitary pads. The overall concordance rate of MB hrHPV capture sequencing and cervical HPV testing was 92.7% (95% CI, 88.3%-97.1%), with a κ value of 0.763 (P < .001). Among 24 samples with incomplete concordance or discordant results, 11 samples with additional hrHPV genotypes (45.8%), 5 true-negative samples (20.8%), and the correct hrHPV genotypes of 2 samples (8.3%) were correctly identified by MB hrHPV capture sequencing. MB hrHPV detection of hrHPV was equivalent on different MCDs, with an MB hrHPV-positive rate of 27 of 28 patients (96.4%) for MCD 1, 52 of 57 patients (91.2%) for MCD 2, 27 of 28 patients for MCD 3, 4 of 4 patients (100%) for MCD 4, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) for MCD 5 (P = .76). The sensitivity of the MB hrHPV capture sequencing was 97.7% (95% CI, 95.0%-100%). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that MB hrHPV capture sequencing is a feasible and accurate self-collected approach for cervical cancer screening. This study found that this method is associated with superior performance in identification of HPV genotypes and true-negative events compared with cervical HPV testing.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMenstruationPapillomavirus InfectionsPersistent InfectionUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34940863
PMCPMC8703251
OpenAlexW4200617322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.