ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022
Tracing the Origin and Evolutionary Fate of Recent Gene Retrocopies in Natural Populations of the House Mouse.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The marsupial imprinted gene MLH1 has retrocopies in three marsupial families.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Article
- Retrotransposed gene copies persist under relaxed selection in wild Spodoptera frugiperda.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- The rate and spectrum of new mutations in mice inferred by long-read sequencing.Genome research · 2025Article
- Is the extreme within-population genome size variation real in Spodoptera frugiperda?PloS one · 2025Article
- Full-length RNA transcript sequencing traces brain isoform diversity in house mouse natural populations.Genome research · 2024Article
- The roles of gene duplications in the dynamics of evolutionary conflicts.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Interchromosomal Colocalization with Parental Genes Is Linked to the Function and Evolution of Mammalian Retrocopies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- The de novo assembly of a European wild boar genome revealed unique patterns of chromosomal structural variations and segmental duplications.Animal genetics · 2022Article
- Recent advances and current challenges in population genomics of structural variation in animals and plants.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the contribution of retrogenes to the evolution of genes and genomes has long been recognized, the evolutionary patterns of very recently derived retrocopies that are still polymorphic within natural populations have not been much studied so far. We use here a set of 2,025 such retrocopies in nine house mouse populations from three subspecies (Mus musculus domesticus, M. m. musculus, and M. m. castaneus) to trace their origin and evolutionary fate. We find that ancient house-keeping genes are significantly more likely to generate retrocopies than younger genes and that the propensity to generate a retrocopy depends on its level of expression in the germline. Although most retrocopies are detrimental and quickly purged, we focus here on the subset that appears to be neutral or even adaptive. We show that retrocopies from X-chromosomal parental genes have a higher likelihood to reach elevated frequencies in the populations, confirming the notion of adaptive effects for "out-of-X" retrogenes. Also, retrocopies in intergenic regions are more likely to reach higher population frequencies than those in introns of genes, implying a more detrimental effect when they land within transcribed regions. For a small subset of retrocopies, we find signatures of positive selection, indicating they were involved in a recent adaptation process. We show that the population-specific distribution pattern of retrocopies is phylogenetically informative and can be used to infer population history with a better resolution than with SNP markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.