Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34940322›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Synthesis and Characterization of Slow-Release Fertilizer Hydrogel Based on Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose, Polyvinyl Alcohol, Glycerol and Blended Paper.

Semiu A Kareem, Idayatu Dere, Daniel T Gungula, Fartisincha Peingurta Andrew, Abdullahi M Saddiq, Elizabeth F Adebayo, Vadlya T Tame, Haruna M Kefas, Japari Joseph, David O Patrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Facile Access toPolymers · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Semiu A KareemDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-3750-6171
Idayatu DereDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.
Daniel T GungulaDepartment of Crop Production and Horticulture, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-9989-220X
Fartisincha Peingurta AndrewDepartment of Science Laboratory Technology, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-1820-5181
Abdullahi M SaddiqDepartment of Soil Science, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.
Elizabeth F AdebayoDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.
Vadlya T TameDepartment of Crop Production and Horticulture, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.
Haruna M KefasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.
Japari JosephDepartment of Chemistry, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.
David O PatrickDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Yola 652101, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-950X
Modibbo Adama University of Technology · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, biodegradable slow-release fertilizer (SRF) hydrogels were synthesized from hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), glycerol and urea (SRF1) and HPMC, PVA, glycerol, urea and blended paper (SRF2). The fertilizer hydrogels were characterized by SEM, XRD and FTIR. The swelling capacity of the hydrogels in both distilled and tap water as well as their water retention capacity in sandy soil were evaluated. The hydrogels had good swelling capacity with maximum swelling ratio of 17.2 g/g and 15.6 g/g for SRF1 and SRF2 in distilled, and 14.4 g/g and 15.2 g/g in tap water, respectively. The water retention capacity of the hydrogels in sandy soil exhibited higher water retention when compared with soil without the (SRFs). The soil with the hydrogels was found to have higher water retention than the soil without the hydrogels. The slow-release profile of the hydrogels was also evaluated. The result suggested that the prepared fertilizer hydrogels has a good controlled release capacity. The blended paper component in SRF2 was observed to aid effective release of urea, with about 87.01% release in soil at 44 days compared to the pure urea which was about 97% release within 4 days. The addition of blended paper as a second layer matrix was found to help improve the release properties of the fertilizer. The swelling kinetic of the hydrogel followed Schott's second order model. The release kinetics of urea in water was best described by Kormeye Peppas, suggesting urea release to be by diffusion via the pores and channels of the SRF, which can be controlled by changing the swelling of the SRF. However, the release mechanism in soil is best described by first order kinetic model, suggesting that the release rate in soil is depended on concentration and probably on diffusion rate via the pores and channels of the SRF.

Indexed as

blended paperhydrogelhydroxy propyl methyl cellulosepolyvinyl alcoholslow-release fertilizer

Identifiers

PMID34940322
PMCPMC8700842
OpenAlexW4200446466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.