Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34940205›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Towards Insect-Friendly Road Lighting-A Transdisciplinary Multi-Stakeholder Approach Involving Citizen Scientists.

Sibylle Schroer, Kat Austen, Nicola Moczek, Gregor Kalinkat, Andreas Jechow, Stefan Heller, Johanna Reinhard, Sophia Dehn, Charis I Wuthenow, Martin Post-Stapelfeldt and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Light pollution of freshwater ecosystems: principles, ecological impacts and remedies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sibylle SchroerLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-2051
Kat AustenLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0062-1670
Nicola MoczekPSY: PLAN Institute for Architectural and Environmental Psychology, 10245 Berlin, Germany.
Gregor KalinkatLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3529-5681
Andreas JechowLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7596-6366
Stefan HellerLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Johanna ReinhardLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Sophia DehnNABU RV Westhavelland e.V., Milower Land, 14715 Brandenburg, Germany.
Charis I WuthenowUmweltzentrum Fulda-Zentrum für Nachhaltigkeit, Gartenkultur und Tierpädagogik e.V., 36041 Fulda, Germany.
Martin Post-StapelfeldtNaturpark Nossentiner/Schwinzer Heide e.V., 19395 Plau am See, Germany.
Roy H A van GrunsvenDutch Butterfly Conservation, P.O. Box 506, 6700 AM Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Catherine Pérez VegaLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Heike SchumacherChair of Lighting Technology TU Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Leena KaanaaChair of Lighting Technology TU Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7255-4585
Birte SaathoffChair of Lighting Technology TU Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Stephan VölkerChair of Lighting Technology TU Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Franz HölkerLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-266X

Funding

Erasmus Sector Skill Alliance Programme 612658-EPP-1-2019-1-EL-EPPKA2-SSAEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 824603Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety 3518685A08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) The project "Tatort Streetlight" implements an insect-friendly road light design in a four year before-after, control-impact (BACI) approach involving citizen scientists. It will broaden the stakeholder interests from solely anthropogenic perspectives to include the welfare of insects and ecosystems. Motivated by the detrimental impacts of road lighting systems on insects, the project aims to find solutions to reduce the insect attraction and habitat fragmentation resulting from roadway illumination. (2) The citizen science approach invites stakeholders to take part and join forces for the development of a sustainable and environmentally friendly road lighting solution. Here, we describe the project strategy, stakeholder participation and motivation, and how the effects of the alternative road luminaire and lighting design can be evaluated. (3) The study compares the changes in (a) insect behavior, (b) night sky brightness, and (c) stakeholder participation and awareness. For this purpose, different experimental areas and stakeholders in four communities in Germany are identified. (4) The project transfers knowledge of adverse effects of improperly managed road illumination and interacts with various stakeholders to develop a new road lighting system that will consider the well-being of street users, local residents, and insects.

Indexed as

artificial light at nightbiodiversitydarkskyEphemeropterainsect declineinsect diversitylight pollutionnightscapesobstructive lightspecies conservationstreet lightingTrichoptera

Identifiers

PMID34940205
PMCPMC8706979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.