Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34940153›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Impact of Biochar on Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth (

Stacey Rice-Marshall, Stephen P Cook, John Randall

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stacey Rice-MarshallDepartment of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Moscow, ID 83844-2329, USA.
Stephen P CookDepartment of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Moscow, ID 83844-2329, USA.
John RandallDepartment of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Moscow, ID 83844-2340, USA.

Funding

University of Idaho Hatch Project IDA01652US Forest Service NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of biochar as a soil amendment in forest ecosystems can be beneficial in the restoration of degraded soils. Forest insects such as the Douglas-fir tussock moth,

Indexed as

compensatory feedingforest defoliatorsoil amendment

Identifiers

PMID34940153
PMCPMC8707533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.