Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34940084›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Delivery of Virtual Care in Oncology: Province-Wide Interprofessional Consensus Statements Using a Modified Delphi Process.

Matthew C Cheung, Bryan B Franco, Nicholas Meti, Alia Thawer, Houman Tahmasebi, Adithya Shankar, Andrew Loblaw, Frances C Wright, Colleen Fox, Naomi Peek and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew C CheungDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Bryan B FrancoDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1452-0210
Nicholas MetiDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada.
Alia ThawerDepartment of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Houman TahmasebiDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada.
Adithya ShankarDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Andrew LoblawDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Frances C WrightDepartment of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Colleen FoxOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Naomi PeekOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Vivian SimDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Simron SinghDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CACancer Care Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

CIHR 00420398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual cancer care (i.e., teleoncology) was rapidly adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic to meet the needs of patients with cancer. However, there is a paucity of guidance for clinicians regarding virtual cancer care. We sought to develop consensus-based statements to guide the optimal provision of virtual care for clinicians caring for patients with cancer, using a modified Delphi consensus process with a 29-member panel consisting of an interprofessional group of clinicians caring for patients with cancer and patient representatives. The consensus process consisted of two rounds and one synchronous final consensus meeting. At the end of the modified Delphi process, 62 of 62 statements achieved consensus. Fifty-seven statements reached consensus in the first round of the process. Concerns regarding the ability to convey difficult news virtually and maintaining similar standards as in-person care without disproportionate strain on clinicians and patients were addressed in the consensus process. We achieved interprofessional consensus on virtual cancer care practices. Further research examining the impact of virtual cancer care on person-centred and clinical outcomes are needed to inform practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDelphi TechniqueHumansSARS-CoV-2consensustelemedicineteleoncologyvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID34940084
PMCPMC8700064
OpenAlexW4200373788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.