Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34939618›Full record

Observational studyLa Medicina del lavoro2021

The role of resilience and coping among Italian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Federica Marcolongo, Marco Ottaviani, Paola Romano, Stefano Bonassi, Ada Garramone, Francesco Infarinato, Patrizia Russo, Andrea Tamburrano, Carlo Tomino, Giulia Prinzi

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in La Medicina del lavoro, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Moral Distress among Frontline Physicians and Nurses in the Early Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica MarcolongoIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. federica.marcolongo@sanraffaele.it.
Marco OttavianiIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. marco.ottaviani@sanraffaele.it.
Paola RomanoIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. paola.romano@sanraffaele.it.
Stefano BonassiIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. stefano.bonassi@sanraffaele.it.
Ada GarramoneIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. ada.garramone@sanraffaele.it.
Francesco InfarinatoIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. francesco.infarinato@sanraffaele.it.
Patrizia Russoa:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:23:"IRCCS San Raffaele Roma";}. patrizia.russo@sanraffaele.it.
Andrea TamburranoIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. andrea.tamburrano@sanraffaele.it.
Carlo TominoIRCCS San Raffaele Roma. carlo.tomino@sanraffaele.it.
Giulia PrinziASL RM 3. giulia.prinzi@gmail.com.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAssociation for Symbolic Logic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the psychological state of healthcare workers (HCWs) in the field of rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsCross-sectional observational study. Sample of 334 HCWs including: nurses, medical doctors, therapists, scientists, and clerical workers working at the IRCCS San Raffaele Roma rehabilitation hospital during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Anonymous web-based questionnaire included 14-item Resilience Scale, Brief-COPE, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, Fear of COVID-19 Scale. Occupational and sociodemographic characteristics.

resultsHigh levels of resilience, low levels of anxiety, depression, and fear were observed in the study population; the most frequently used coping strategies in the Brief-COPE were acceptance, planning, and active coping. Specifically, 87% of the participants reported a moderate to high level of resilience, with the highest level observed in nurses while physicians show the lowest level. HCWs showed symptoms of anxiety (29%), depressive symptoms (10%), and fear caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (44%). Statistically significant differences were observed between different occupations for fear (p <0.05) and resilience (p <0.01). Levels of anxiety and fear appeared to be higher in female and younger workers. The latter group - who also reported higher levels of depression - showed lower levels of resilience.

conclusionsIn our study hospital and non-hospital workers show different emotional, cognitive, and behavioural resources when facing stressful situations, like in the case of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemics. Our results support the role of resilience and the proper use of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies as protective factors from psychological distress.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdaptation, PsychologicalAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34939618
PMCPMC8759053
OpenAlexW4200485188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.