Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34939428›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2021

Restoration of elective spine surgery during the first wave of COVID-19 : a UK-wide British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) prospective, multicentre, observational study.

Riaz Mohammed, Pranav Shah, Alexander Durst, Naveen J Mathai, Alexandru Budu, Julie Woodfield, Tom Marjoram, Matthew Sewell, BASS Collaborative Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Riaz MohammedUniversity Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2334-3551
Pranav ShahUniversity Hospital of Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1550-4888
Alexander DurstUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Naveen J MathaiPrincess Of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6341-8573
Alexandru BuduUniversity Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6783-6943
Julie WoodfieldCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-500X
Tom MarjoramIpswich Hospital, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1050-0984
Matthew SewellThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
BASS Collaborative Study Group
East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust · GBNHS Lothian · GBNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBNoah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales · GBPrincess of Wales Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWith resumption of elective spine surgery services in the UK following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multicentre British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) collaborative study to examine the complications and deaths due to COVID-19 at the recovery phase of the pandemic. The aim was to analyze the safety of elective spinal surgery during the pandemic.

methodsA prospective observational study was conducted from eight spinal centres for the first month of operating following restoration of elective spine surgery in each individual unit. Primary outcome measure was the 30-day postoperative COVID-19 infection rate. Secondary outcomes analyzed were the 30-day mortality rate, surgical adverse events, medical complications, and length of inpatient stay.

resultsIn all, 257 patients (128 males) with a median age of 54 years (2 to 88) formed the study cohort. The mean number of procedures performed from each unit was 32 (16 to 101), with 118 procedures (46%) done as category three prioritization level. The majority of patients (87%) were low-medium "risk stratification" category and the mean length of hospital stay was 5.2 days. None of the patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection, nor was there any mortality related to COVID-19 during the 30-day follow-up period, with 25 patients (10%) having been tested for symptoms. Overall, 32 patients (12%) developed a total of 34 complications, with the majority (19/34) being grade 1 to 2 Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. No patient required postoperative care in an intensive care setting for any unexpected complication.

conclusionThis study shows that safe and effective planned spinal surgical services can be restored avoiding viral transmission, with diligent adherence to national guidelines and COVID-19-secure pathways tailored according to the resources of the individual spinal units. Cite this article:

Indexed as

BASS collaborativecancercoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)elective spinal surgeriesElective spinal surgeryelective surgeriesmedical complicationsMulticentric studyorthopaedic surgeriesPCR testsPost operative COVID 19 infectionspinal surgeriesSpine Surgeonssurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID34939428
PMCPMC8711666
OpenAlexW4200619509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.