Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34939318›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2022

'Is there any point in me doing this?' Views and experiences of women in the Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing (DAME) trial.

Anita M Moorhead, Lisa H Amir, Della A Forster, Sharinne B Crawford

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Antenatal colostrum expression: are we interfering with nature?International breastfeeding journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Facilitators and barriers to establishing lactation among women with diabetes?Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Article
  11. A Longitudinal Observation of Antenatal Milk Expression in Mothers of Infants with Congenital Anomalies.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2024
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anita M MoorheadJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1944-0036
Lisa H AmirJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2510-1399
Della A ForsterJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6083-087X
Sharinne B CrawfordJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-9861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing (DAME) randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 2011-2015, at six sites in Melbourne, Australia to explore the effect of advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breast milk from 36 weeks gestation. Infants whose mothers were randomised to express in pregnancy were more likely to be exclusively breast milk fed during their hospital stay, and there was no evidence of harm. This paper explores women's views and experiences of antenatal expressing. In this two-arm RCT, 635 women with diabetes in pregnancy who were otherwise of low medical risk were randomised at 36-37 weeks gestation to usual care (not expressing, n = 316), or the intervention, where women were advised to hand express for 10 min twice daily until birth (n = 319). Semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 women who expressed antenatally. They were asked about their experiences of antenatal expressing, including how they felt about the overall experience, the amount of breast milk they expressed, making time to express, and their experience of breastfeeding. Thematic analysis of the in-depth interviews identified six themes: (1) learning and adapting expressing, (2) feelings and sensations associated with expressing, (3) support, (4) dis/empowerment, (5) health, and (6) the value of breast milk. Women had both positive and negative experiences of antenatal expressing. If health professionals are advising antenatal expressing to women, it is important they understand the range of outcomes and experiences.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPrenatal CareBreast FeedingEnkephalin, MethionineFemaleHumansInfantMilk, HumanPregnancyQualitative Researchenkephalinamide-Met, Ala(2)-Enkephalin, Methionineantenatal expressing experiencebreastfeedingbreast milkdiabetespregnancyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34939318
PMCPMC8932693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.