Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34939239›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2022

Detection methods targeting the positive- and negative-sense RNA transcripts from plus-stranded RNA viruses.

Signe Ravn Warncke, Charlotte Rohde Knudsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Detection methods targeting the positive- and negative-sense RNA transcripts from plus-stranded RNA viruses.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Signe Ravn WarnckeDepartment of Molecular Biology & Genetics, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Charlotte Rohde KnudsenDepartment of Molecular Biology & Genetics, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The largest group of viruses in the Baltimore classification system comprises viruses with a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome. Once the viral genome is released into the cytoplasm of a specific host cell following virus entry, it functions directly as an mRNA, and the virus-encoded proteins that are essential for genome replication are produced by the translation apparatus of the host cell. The positive-sense genome is replicated in two stages, initially the positive strand is copied to make a negative-sense RNA, which then functions as the template for transcription of many new positive-sense genomes. Virus infections can be detected at different stages throughout the infection cycle for diagnostic and scientific purposes. Here, the advantages and disadvantages of some of the relevant methods for genome detection will be briefly reviewed with special emphasis on techniques allowing strand-specific RNA detection. Furthermore, tools of the future are considered.

Indexed as

RNA VirusesVirus ReplicationGenome, ViralHumansRNA, ViralRNA, ViralgenomemethodsPlus-stranded RNA virusesreplicationRT-PCRstrand-specific detection

Identifiers

PMID34939239
PMCPMC9306919
OpenAlexW4200626085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.