ArticleKidney medicine
Genetic Testing for Chronic Kidney Diseases: Clinical Utility and Barriers Perceived by Nephrologists.
Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI in variant analysis: fast track to genetic diagnoses.Human genetics · 2026Review
- Opportunities for renal genetic evaluation among pregnant patients with kidney disease.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Global Perspectives on Genetic Testing Among Nephrologists.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Structured Application of Genetic Testing in a Pediatric Kidney Clinic.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- Results of Multigene Panel Testing, IncludingKidney medicine · 2026Article
- Genetic etiology of inherited kidney diseases in egyptian patients: next generation sequencing identifies six novel variants.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2025Article
- Barriers to the implementation of epilepsy genetic testing and counseling guidelines.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Patient Satisfaction Following a Session With a Kidney Genetic Counselor.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Characterization of Monogenic Kidney Disease in Older Patients With CKD.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Navigating Genetic Testing in Nephrology: Options and Decision-Making Strategies.Kidney international reports · 2025Review
- Pediatric nephrologists' perspectives and clinical practices related to genetic testing and education.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Implementation of a Kidney Genetic Service Into the Diagnostic Pathway for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Canada.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Utility of Genetic Testing in Adults with CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Genetics of kidney stones and the role of genetic testing in prevention: a guide for urologists.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Framework for standardized genetic testing recommendations for chronic kidney disease in Ontario.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Characteristics and Yield of Modern Approaches for the Diagnosis of Genetic Causes of Kidney Stone Disease.Genes · 2024Review
- Implementation and Evaluation of a National Multidisciplinary Kidney Genetics Clinic Network Over 10 Years.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- The Role of Genetic Testing in Adult CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE &
objectiveThe identification of pathogenic variants in genes associated with chronic kidney disease can provide patients and nephrologists with actionable information to guide diagnoses and therapeutic plans. However, many nephrologists do not use genetic testing despite costs decreasing over time and more widespread availability. STUDY
designWe conducted a survey to uncover the perceptions of general adult nephrologists about the utility of and barriers to genetic testing in clinical practice. SETTING &
participantsThe online survey was administered to board-certified nephrologists (n = 10,054) in the United States. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We analyzed demographic characteristics of the survey respondents and their responses in the context of their use of genetic testing in routine clinical practice.
resultsA total of 149 nephrologists completed the survey, with 72% (107 of 149) reporting genetic test use in their practice. On average, tests were ordered for 3.8% of their patient population. Thirty-five percent of responses from nephrologists without a history of genetic test use ranked perceived barriers as "extremely significant" compared with 23% of responses from those who had previously used genetic tests. However, both users and nonusers of genetic tests indicated high cost (users: 46%, 49 of 107; nonusers 69%, 29 of 42) and poor availability or lack of ease (users: 33%, 35 of 107; nonusers: 57%; 24 of 42) of genetic testing as the most significant perceived barriers to implementation. LIMITATIONS: The survey used in this study was not previously validated; additionally, because of the relatively small number of responses, there might have been a selection bias among the responders.
conclusionsAlthough most nephrologists reported using genetic tests in clinical practice, high costs and poor availability or the lack of ease of use were perceived as the most important barriers to routine adoption. These observations indicate that educational programs that cover a range of topics, from genetics of chronic kidney disease to selection of the test, may help mitigate these barriers and enhance the use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.