ArticleBioactive materials2022
A deep-learning-based workflow to deal with the defocusing problem in high-throughput experiments.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PostFocus: automated selective post-acquisition high-throughput focus restoration using diffusion model for label-free time-lapse microscopy.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A paradigm for high-throughput screening of cell-selective surfaces coupling orthogonal gradients and machine learning-based cell recognition.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing throughput of experiments in biomaterials research makes automatic techniques more and more necessary. Among all the characterization methods, microscopy makes fundamental contributions to biomaterials science where precisely focused images are the basis of related research. Although automatic focusing has been widely applied in all kinds of microscopes, defocused images can still be acquired now and then due to factors including background noises of materials and mechanical errors. Herein, we present a deep-learning-based method for the automatic sorting and reconstruction of defocused cell images. First, the defocusing problem is illustrated on a high-throughput cell microarray. Then, a comprehensive dataset of phase-contrast images captured from varied conditions containing multiple cell types, magnifications, and substrate materials is prepared to establish and test our method. We obtain high accuracy of over 0.993 on the dataset using a simple network architecture that requires less than half of the training time compared with the classical ResNetV2 architecture. Moreover, the subcellular-level reconstruction of heavily defocused cell images is achieved with another architecture. The applicability of the established workflow in practice is finally demonstrated on the high-throughput cell microarray. The intelligent workflow does not require a priori knowledge of focusing algorithms, possessing widespread application value in cell experiments concerning high-throughput or time-lapse imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.