Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34938902›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2021

Using mixed methods to explore diabetes care in a medium-secure setting in England: A case study.

Tammi Walker, Amanda Edmondson, Fleur Riley, Mark Harper, Mike Lucock, Nat Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tammi WalkerPsychology Teesside University Middlesbrough UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7446-8771
Amanda EdmondsonUniversity of Huddersfield School of Human and Health Sciences Huddersfield UK.
Fleur RileyPsychology Teesside University Middlesbrough UK.
Mark HarperUniversity of Huddersfield School of Human and Health Sciences Huddersfield UK.
Mike LucockUniversity of Huddersfield School of Human and Health Sciences Huddersfield UK.
Nat WrightUniversity of Huddersfield School of Human and Health Sciences Huddersfield UK.
University of Huddersfield · GBTeesside University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDiabetes is highly prevalent among individuals with serious mental illness. Managing diabetes in forensic mental health settings presents unique challenges which are under-reported and poorly understood. This study aimed to explore diabetes care in a medium-secure setting and identify key areas for improvement.

methodsA single case study design used a retrospective chart review. Qualitative interviews and a focus group were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsPrevalence of diabetes was over twice that of the general population and highest in female service users. Evidence suggests limited understanding and lack of diabetes education for staff and service users, and difficulties in accessing external diabetes recourses.

conclusionConstraints inherent to forensic mental health settings contribute to difficulties in accessing external resources and adequate diabetes education. Secure mental health services should adopt a collaborative approach to diabetes care and provide appropriate specialist training to both staff and service users.

Indexed as

diabetesforensicsecure settingsevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID34938902
PMCPMC8671897
OpenAlexW4200009184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.