Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34938899›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2021

Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Keith Reisinger-Kindle, Neena Qasba, Colby Cayton, Shiva Niakan, Alexander Knee, Sarah L Goff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Keith Reisinger-KindleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boonshoft School of Medicine Wright State University Dayton Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2922-2582
Neena QasbaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Massachusetts-Baystate Medical Center Springfield Massachusetts USA.
Colby CaytonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Massachusetts-Baystate Medical Center Springfield Massachusetts USA.
Shiva NiakanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Massachusetts-Baystate Medical Center Springfield Massachusetts USA.
Alexander KneeOffice of Research, Epidemiology/Biostatistics Research Core Tufts University/University of Massachusetts-Baystate Medical Center Springfield Massachusetts USA.
Sarah L GoffDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts USA.
Baystate Medical Center · USTufts University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USWright State University · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCOVID-19 forced healthcare systems to implement telehealth programs, facilitated in Massachusetts by a policy requiring insurers to reimburse for telehealth visits. Prior studies suggest that telehealth is effective for obstetric care, but little is known about its implementation in response to policy changes in underserved communities. We utilized the RE-AIM framework to evaluate telehealth implementation in a large academic urban obstetric practice that serves a medically underserved population.

methodsRE-AIM elements were assessed through retrospective review of electronic health record (EHR) data for all obstetric encounters between March 19 and August 31, 2020 and review of clinic implementation processes. Data extracted included demographics, number and type (in-person or telehealth) of prenatal visits, prenatal diagnoses, delivery outcomes, and number and type of postpartum visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsA total of 558 patients (60.6% Hispanic; 13.2% primary language Spanish) had 1788 prenatal visits, of which 698 (39.0%) were telehealth visits. A total of 209 patients had 230 postpartum visits, of which 101 (48.3%) were telehealth visits. The

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has changed traditional approaches to healthcare delivery. We demonstrate that the use of the RE-AIM framework can be effective in facilitating implementation of telephone visits in a large academic urban obstetric practice after state-level policy change. This may be of particular importance in settings serving patients at higher risk for maternal morbidity and poor birth outcomes.

Indexed as

healthcare policyimplementation analysispostpartum careprenatal caretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34938899
PMCPMC8670728
OpenAlexW4200288490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.