ReviewHip & pelvis2021
A Review and Description of Acetabular Impaction Bone Grafting: Updating the Traditional Technique.
Review in Hip & pelvis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with open reduction and internal fixation for elderly acetabular fractures: a two-center retrospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Observational
- Robotic-Assisted Triple Reaming Technique for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Protrusio Acetabuli.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Two-stage Acetabular Impaction Bone Grafting: A Case Report.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2025Article
- Total Hip Arthroplasty in Protrusio Acetabuli: A Systematic Review.Hip & pelvis · 2024Review
- Acetabular Fracture Outcomes and Complications: An International Comparison.Kansas journal of medicine · 2024Article
- Impaction bone grafting for contained acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restoring acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty is a major challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. This paper discusses the traditional cemented technique of impaction bone grafting as applied to the acetabulum, as well as the evolution of the technique to employ uncemented implants. Some of the recent published literature regarding these techniques is reviewed and the personal experiences of the senior author with these techniques are also reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.