Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34938525›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Pollinator individual-based networks reveal the specialized plant-pollinator mutualism in two biodiverse communities.

Lin-Lin Wang, Yong-Ping Yang, Yuan-Wen Duan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lin-Lin WangGermplasm Bank of Wild Species Kunming Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-5274
Yong-Ping YangGermplasm Bank of Wild Species Kunming Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0327-2664
Yuan-Wen DuanGermplasm Bank of Wild Species Kunming Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-5116
Kunming Institute of Botany · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalization of pollination systems is widely accepted by ecologists in the studies of plant-pollinator interaction networks at the community level, but the degree of generalization of pollination networks remains largely unknown at the individual pollinator level. Using potential legitimate pollinators that were constantly visiting flowers in two alpine meadow communities, we analyzed the differences in the pollination network structure between the pollinator individual level and species level. The results showed that compared to the pollinator species-based networks, the linkage density, interaction diversity, interaction evenness, the average plant linkage level, and interaction diversity increased, but connectance, degree of nestedness, the average of pollinator linkage level, and interaction diversity decreased in the pollinator individual-based networks, indicating that pollinator individuals had a narrower food niche than their counterpart species. Pollination networks at the pollinator individual level were more specialized at the network level (

Indexed as

generalizationindividual‐based networkpollination networkQinghai–Tibet Plateauspecialization

Identifiers

PMID34938525
PMCPMC8668776
OpenAlexW3217211195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.