Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34938443›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences.

Erin E Shortlidge, Alison Jolley, Stephanie Shaulskiy, Emily Geraghty Ward, Christopher N Lorentz, Kari O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. So You Want to Teach a Field-Based Course: A Practical Toolkit for Teaching Teams.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erin E ShortlidgeDepartment of Biology Portland State University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-1178
Alison JolleyTe Puna Ako - Centre for Tertiary Teaching & Learning University of Waikato Hamilton New Zealand.
Stephanie ShaulskiyBiological Station University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Emily Geraghty WardGeology Program Rocky Mountain College Billings Montana USA.
Christopher N LorentzDepartment of Biological Sciences Thomas More University Crestview Hills Kentucky USA.
Kari O'ConnellSTEM Research Center Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undergraduate field experiences (UFEs) are a prominent element of science education across many disciplines; however, empirical data regarding the outcomes are often limited. UFEs are unique in that they typically take place in a field setting, are often interdisciplinary, and include diverse students. UFEs range from courses, to field trips, to residential research experiences, and thereby have the potential to yield a plethora of outcomes for undergraduate participants. The UFE community has expressed interest in better understanding how to assess the outcomes of UFEs. In response, we developed a guide for practitioners to use when assessing their UFE that promotes an evidence-based, systematic, iterative approach. This essay guides practitioners through the steps of: identifying intended UFE outcomes, considering contextual factors, determining an assessment approach, and using the information gained to inform next steps. We provide a table of common learning outcomes with aligned assessment tools, and vignettes to illustrate using the assessment guide. We aim to support comprehensive, informed assessment of UFEs, thus leading to more inclusive and reflective UFE design, and ultimately improved student outcomes. We urge practitioners to move toward evidence-based advocacy for continued support of UFEs.

Indexed as

assessmentfield experiencesinclusionlearning outcomesundergraduates

Identifiers

PMID34938443
PMCPMC8668733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.