ArticleInterface focus2021
Comparative biomechanics of the
Article in Interface focus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- CSGM: A R Package to Conduct a Robust Cross-Sectional Geometric Morphometric Analysis.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Article
- Is the human chin a spandrel? Insights from an evolutionary analysis of ape craniomandibular form.PloS one · 2026Article
- A new biomechanical model of the mammal jaw based on load path analysis.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- Regional variation of the cortical and trabecular bone material properties in the rabbit skull.PloS one · 2024Article
- Dynamic finite element modelling of the macaque mandible during a complete mastication gape cycle.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Assessment of the mechanical role of cranial sutures in the mammalian skull: Computational biomechanical modelling of the rat skull.Journal of morphology · 2023Article
- Does the model reflect the system? When two-dimensional biomechanics is not 'good enough'.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanical behaviour of the mandibles of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.