ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021
DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeast
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The genotoxic stress-inducible geneVirulence · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, Diagnostics and Therapy of Vulvovaginal Fungal Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fungal DNA damage repair: from model to driver of virulence and AMR.Bioscience reports · 2026Review
- Ergosterol remodeling by the MARVEL protein Mrv6 links genotoxic stress adaptation to virulence in Candida albicans.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Rad53 orchestrates divergent pathways governing genotoxic resistance, morphogenesis, and virulence inVirulence · 2025Article
- Histone Phosphorylation in DNA Damage Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Enhanced multistress tolerance ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- DNA damage repair factor Rad18 controls virulence partially via transcriptional suppression of genesVirulence · 2024Article
- DNA Damage Checkpoints Govern Global Gene Transcription and Exhibit Species-Specific Regulation onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Importance of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Mec1-Rad53 Signaling Regulates DNA Damage-Induced Autophagy and Pathogenicity inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- DNA damage repair proteins across the Tree of Life.iScience · 2023Article
- E2F4DN Transgenic Mice: A Tool for the Evaluation of E2F4 as a Therapeutic Target in Neuropathology and Brain Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Transcriptional Profiling of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cells are constantly challenged by internal or external genotoxic assaults, which may induce a high frequency of DNA lesions, leading to genome instability. Accumulation of damaged DNA is severe or even lethal to cells and can result in abnormal proliferation that can cause cancer in multicellular organisms, aging or cell death. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a comprehensive defence system termed the DNA damage response (DDR) to monitor and remove lesions in their DNA. The DDR has been extensively studied in the budding yeast
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.