Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34938010›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2020

Single visit versus multiple visit root canal.

Fahmida Binti Abd Rahman, Mahesh Ramakrishnan, M S Niveditha

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fahmida Binti Abd RahmanSaveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 77, India.
Mahesh RamakrishnanSaveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 77, India.
M S NivedithaSaveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 77, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single visit endodontics offers many advantages over multi visit treatment. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the preference of single visit over multiple visit root canals. We used 86,000 patient records and selected 9017 records matching the inclusion criteria for the analysis using statistical tools (Chi square test at p value <0.05). Data shows that people between 26 to 45 years are often affected with dental caries. Available data is biased towards multi visits rather than single visit regardless number of canals.

Indexed as

Canalsmulti visitspulp necrosissingle visit

Identifiers

PMID34938010
PMCPMC8600193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.