Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34937702›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Category-Biased Neural Representations Form Spontaneously during Learning That Emphasizes Memory for Specific Instances.

Stefania R Ashby, Dagmar Zeithamova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distinct Hippocampal Mechanisms Support Concept Formation and Updating.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantifying Bias in Hierarchical Category Systems.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefania R AshbyDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon Eugene, OR, 97403.ORCID 0000-0001-8480-6105
Dagmar ZeithamovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon Eugene, OR, 97403 dasa@uoregon.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0310-5030

Funding

Neural mechanisms of specificity and generalization learningR01NS112366 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ZEITHAMOVA, DAGMAR · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Category learning, learning to sort a set of stimuli into categories or groups, can induce category biases in perception such that items in the same category are perceived as more similar than items from different categories. To what degree category bias develops when learning goals emphasize individuation of each stimulus and whether the bias emerges spontaneously during learning itself rather than in response to task demands is unclear. Here, we used functional MRI (fMRI) during encoding to test for category biases in neural representations of individual stimuli during learning. Human participants (males and females) encountered face-blend stimuli with unique first names and shared family names that indicated category membership. Participants were instructed to learn the full name for each face. Neural pattern classification and pattern similarity analyses were used to track category information in the brain. Results showed that stimulus category could be decoded during encoding across many frontal, parietal, and occipital regions. Furthermore, two stimuli from the same category were represented more similarly in the prefrontal cortex than two stimuli from different categories equated for physical similarity. These findings illustrate that a mere presence of category label can bias neural representations spontaneously during encoding to emphasize category-relevant information, even in the absence of explicit categorization demands and when category-irrelevant information remains relevant for task goals.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMemoryAdolescentAdultBrainCuesFemaleGoalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalecategorizationcategory biasmultivoxel pattern analysispattern similarity analysisperceived similarity

Identifiers

PMID34937702
PMCPMC8808730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.