Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34937587›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2021

Evaluating the performance of machine learning models for automatic diagnosis of patients with schizophrenia based on a single site dataset of 440 participants.

Lung-Hao Lee, Chang-Hao Chen, Wan-Chen Chang, Po-Lei Lee, Kuo-Kai Shyu, Mu-Hong Chen, Ju-Wei Hsu, Ya-Mei Bai, Tung-Ping Su, Pei-Chi Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lung-Hao LeeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0472-7429
Chang-Hao ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7557-7099
Wan-Chen ChangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Po-Lei LeeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Kuo-Kai ShyuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0505-5898
Mu-Hong ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-1073
Ju-Wei HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ya-Mei BaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tung-Ping SuDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pei-Chi TuDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupport vector machines (SVMs) based on brain-wise functional connectivity (FC) have been widely adopted for single-subject prediction of patients with schizophrenia, but most of them had small sample size. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of SVMs based on a large single-site dataset and investigate the effects of demographic homogeneity and training sample size on classification accuracy.

methodsThe resting functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) dataset comprised 220 patients with schizophrenia and 220 healthy controls. Brain-wise FCs was calculated for each participant and linear SVMs were developed for automatic classification of patients and controls. First, we evaluated the SVMs based on all participants and homogeneous subsamples of men, women, younger (18-30 years), and older (31-50 years) participants by 10-fold nested cross-validation. Then, we hold out a fixed test set of 40 participants (20 patients and 20 controls) and evaluated the SVMs based on incremental training sample sizes (N = 40, 80, …, 400).

resultsWe found that the SVMs based on all participants had accuracy of 85.05%. The SVMs based on male, female, young, and older participants yielded accuracy of 84.66, 81.56, 80.50, and 86.13%, respectively. Although the SVMs based on older subsamples had better performance than those based on all participants, they generalized poorly to younger participants (77.24%). For incremental training sizes, the classification accuracy increased stepwise from 72.6 to 83.3%, with >80% accuracy achieved with sample size >240.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that SVMs based on a large dataset yield high classification accuracy and establish models using a large sample size with heterogeneous properties are recommended for single subject prediction of schizophrenia.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaBrainFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRestSupport Vector MachineAutomatic classificationfunctional connectivityhomogeneousschizophrenic disordersupport vector machinetraining sample size

Identifiers

PMID34937587
PMCPMC8792868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.