ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2022
Repairing Volumetric Muscle Loss in the Ovine Peroneus Tertius Following a 6-Month Recovery.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward an Integrated Strategy for Volumetric Muscle Loss Regeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- When rehabilitation is not enough, how targeting metabolism can overcome the limited plasticity of skeletal muscle after traumatic injury.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Mouse Models of Muscle Fibrosis: Mechanisms, Methods, and Applications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Impact of Passaging Primary Skeletal Muscle Cell Isolates on the Engineering of Skeletal Muscle.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2025Article
- Current Methodologies for Inducing Aligned Myofibers in Tissue Constructs for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Regeneration.Advances in wound care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue-engineered skeletal muscle is a promising novel therapy for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss (VML). Our laboratory has developed tissue-engineered skeletal muscle units (SMUs) and engineered neural conduits (ENCs), and modularly scaled them to clinically relevant sizes for the treatment of VML in a large animal (sheep) model. In a previous study, we evaluated the effects of the SMUs and ENCs in treating a 30% VML injury in the ovine peroneus tertius muscle after a 3-month recovery period. The goal of the current study was to expand on our 3-month study and evaluate the SMUs and ENCs in restoring muscle function after a 6-month recovery period. Six months after implantation, we found that the repair groups with the SMU (VML+SMU and VML+SMU+ENC) restored muscle mass to a level that was statistically indistinguishable from the uninjured contralateral muscle. In contrast, the muscle mass in the VML-Only group was significantly less than groups repaired with an SMU. Following the 6-month recovery from VML, the maximum tetanic force was significantly lower for all VML injured groups compared with the uninjured contralateral muscle. However, we did demonstrate the ability of our ENCs to effectively regenerate nerve between the distal stump of the native nerve and the repair site in 14 of the 15 animals studied. Impact Statement Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is a clinically relevant problem for which current treatment options are lacking and for which tissue-engineered skeletal muscle presents a promising novel therapeutic option. However, the fabrication of tissues of clinically relevant sizes is necessary for advancement of the technology to the clinic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our scaled-up tissue-engineered skeletal muscle to treat VML in a large animal (sheep) model after a 6-month recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.