Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34937230›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Clinical profile, visual outcome and root cause analysis of post-operative cluster endophthalmitis due to

Amit Kumar Deb, Pratima Chavan, Subashini Kaliaperumal, Sujatha Sistla, Haritha Madigubba, Sandip Sarkar, Aswathi Neena

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit Kumar DebDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Pratima ChavanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Subashini KaliaperumalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Sujatha SistlaDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Haritha MadigubbaDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Sandip SarkarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Aswathi NeenaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present varied clinical presentations, surveillance reports, and final visual outcomes of a rare outbreak of cluster endophthalmitis caused by gram-negative, opportunistic bacilli, Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc).

methodsDetails of five patients who developed postoperative cluster endophthalmitis were collected. For each patient, an undiluted vitreous sample was collected during vitreous tap. Bacterial culture from the vitreous sample in each case had grown Bcc. Surveillance investigations for root cause analysis (RCA) were performed in the operating room (OR), admission, and day-care wards to localize the source.

resultsFour patients had undergone phacoemulsification surgery, and one patient had undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Each patient received an initial dose of empiric intravitreal ceftazidime and vancomycin. The organism isolated in each case was sensitive to ceftazidime, cotrimoxazole, and meropenem and resistant to other antibiotics. Core vitrectomy was done after 48-60 hours in four patients along with intravitreal imipenem injection. One patient did not provide consent for core vitrectomy and subsequently developed phthisis bulbi. Three patients had subsequent recurrences. Two patients had a final BCVA of 20/60, two had BCVA better than 20/200, while one patient had no perception of light. None of the surveillance samples from the OR complex could isolate Burkholderia.

conclusionExtensive OR surveillance should be done to identify the potential source of infection. However, the source may not be identifiable in few instances like in our case. Longer follow-up is recommended in cases of Bcc endophthalmitis due to the persistent nature of the infection.

Indexed as

Burkholderia cepacia complexEndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansRetrospective StudiesRoot Cause AnalysisVitrectomyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBurkholderia cepacia complexcluster endophthalmitispostoperative endophthalmitisroot cause analysis

Identifiers

PMID34937230
PMCPMC8917597
OpenAlexW4200530165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.