ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Visual outcomes and quality of life before and after photorefractive keratectomy.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating postoperative quality of life and satisfaction in physicians undergoing small incision lenticule extraction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Commentary: Surface ablation: Renewed interest.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Commentary: Comparative analysis of quality of life in photorefractive keratectomy.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Refractive Management of Surgical-Induced Presbyopia in a Young Patient with Vision-Related Quality of Life Complaints: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare visual outcomes and vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) between subjects before and after photorefractive keratotomy (PRK) and controls. In addition, VRQoL was compared between subjects at different periods of PRK surgery.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study that included subjects with refractive errors aged 19-40 years and age-matched controls. Subjects were divided into three groups: pre-, post-PRK, and control. Subjects in the post-PRK group were divided into three subgroups (1-week, <6-month, and >6-month follow-up visits). Measurements including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE) of manifest refraction, and corneal topography were obtained for all participants. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire was administered to compare VRQOL between groups and between post-refractive surgery subgroups.
resultsA total of 145 participants were included in this study. The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of all participants was 26.29 ± 5.1 years. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in total QIRC scores between groups. The total QIRC score was better in the post-PRK group than in the pre-PRK and control groups. The scores of items included in the convenience, well-being, and health concern domains were significantly higher in the post-PRK group than in the pre-PRK and control groups. Within the post-PRK group, significant differences (P < 0.001) were found in UCVA and SE between the post-PRK subgroups. Uncorrected VA and SE were better in the post-PRK groups who were followed up in the < 6 and > 6 months subgroups than in the 1-week follow-up subgroup (P < 0.0001).
conclusionA significant improvement in visual outcomes and VRQoL occurred after PRK surgery. Subjects enjoyed their VRQoL after refractive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.