ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021
Biosafety and Proteome Profiles of Different Heat Inactivation Methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Extraction From Mycobacterium spp. for Identification by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.Current protocols · 2026Article
- Impact of inactivation methods on biosafety and antigen reactivity of Brucella melitensis from the perspective of Astral-DIA proteomics based on antibody immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies involving the pathogenic organism Mycobacterium tuberculosis routinely require advanced biosafety laboratory facilities, which might not be readily available in rural areas where tuberculosis burdens are high. Attempts to adapt heat inactivation techniques have led to inconsistent conclusions, and the risk of protein denaturation due to extensive heating is impractical for subsequent mass spectrometry (MS)-based protein analyses. In this study, 240 specimens with one or two loops of M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv biomass and specific inactivated solutions were proportionally assigned to six heat inactivation methods in a thermal block at 80°C and 95°C for 20, 30, and 90 min. Twenty untreated specimens served as a positive control, and bacterial growth was followed up for 12 weeks. Our results showed that 90 min of heat inactivation was necessary for samples with two loops of biomass. Further protein extraction and a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) MS assay demonstrated adequate scores for bacterial identification (≥1.7), with the highest score achieved in the 80°C/90 min and 95°C/30 min treatment groups. A proteomics study also confidently identified 648 proteins with ∼93% to 96% consistent protein abundances following heating at 95°C for 20, 30, and 90 min. Heat inactivation at 95°C for 90 min yielded the most quantifiable proteins, and a functional analysis revealed proteins located in the ribosomal subunit. In summary, we proposed a heat inactivation method for the M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv and studied the preservation of protein components for subsequent bacterial identification and protein-related assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.