ArticleJournal of innate immunity2022
Differential Internalization of Thrombin-Derived Host Defense Peptides into Monocytes and Macrophages.
Article in Journal of innate immunity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The journey of bioactive peptides in vivo: cutting-edge advances in absorption, transport, and bioavailability.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Review
- Rational design of thrombin-derived VFR12 analogs with enhanced antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and anti-inflammatory properties.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteolytic cleavage of thrombin generates C-terminal host defense peptides exerting multiple immunomodulatory effects in response to bacterial stimuli. Previously, we reported that thrombin-derived C-terminal peptides (TCPs) are internalized in monocytes and macrophages in a time- and temperature-dependent manner. In this study, we investigated which endocytosis pathways are responsible for the internalization of TCPs. Using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, we show that both clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent pathways are involved in the internalization of the prototypic TCP GKY25 in RAW264.7 and human monocyte-derived M1 macrophages, whereas the uptake of GKY25 in monocytic THP-1 cells is mainly dynamin-dependent. Internalized GKY25 was transported to endosomes and finally lysosomes, where it remained detectable for up to 10 h. Comparison of GKY25 uptake with that of the natural occurring TCPs HVF18 and FYT21 indicates that the pathway of TCP endocytosis is not only cell type-dependent but also depends on the length and composition of the peptide as well as the presence of LPS and bacteria. Finally, using neutron reflectometry, we show that the observed differences between HVF18 and the other 2 TCPs may be explained partially by differences in membrane insertion. Taken together, we show that TCPs are differentially internalized into monocytes and macrophages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.