Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34936827›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2022

Qualitative Research Methods in Chronic Disease: Introduction and Opportunities to Promote Health Equity.

Rachel C Shelton, Morgan M Philbin, Shoba Ramanadhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; email: rs3108@cumc.columbia.edu, mp3243@columbia.edu.
Morgan M PhilbinDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; email: rs3108@cumc.columbia.edu, mp3243@columbia.edu.
Shoba RamanadhanDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; email: sramanadhan@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

U Mass Boston / DFHCC U54 Partnership (1 of 2)U54CA156732 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Shoba Ramanadhan · 2010 to 2026
$25.6M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health research that addresses chronic disease has historically underutilized and undervalued qualitative methods. This has limited the field's ability to advance (

Indexed as

Health EquityChronic DiseaseHealth PromotionHumansQualitative ResearchResearch Designchronic diseasehealth disparitieshealth equityqualitative analysisqualitative inquiry frameworksqualitative methodsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34936827
PMCPMC10580302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.