Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34936704›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2022

E-Cigarette Dependence in Youth.

Martha Pienkowski, Michael Chaiton, Jolene Dubray, Robert Schwartz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for quitting vaping.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions for quitting vaping.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. What is the Addictive Potential from Vaping?Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of Indicators of Dependence for Vaping and Smoking: Trends Between 2017 and 2022 Among Youth in Canada, England, and the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  11. Interventions for quitting vaping.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martha PienkowskiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael ChaitonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9589-2122
Jolene DubrayDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5372-8439
Robert SchwartzDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7838-0769
University of Toronto · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe majority of e-cigarette vaping youth use nicotine when vaping. Some then become dependent on the nicotine, which can result in subsequent health effects. There has been limited evaluation of convergent validity of e-cigarette dependence measures for use specifically in youth. The aim of this study was to investigate and validate various e-cigarette dependence measures for use in youth populations. AIMS AND

methodsOne thousand two hundred and five Canadian youth aged 16-24 who completed a cross-sectional online survey reported vaping at least monthly and were thus included in the analysis. E-cigarette dependence was assessed using a modified Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PS-ECDI), the E-Cigarette Dependence Scale (EDS), a self-perceived vaping dependence question, and time to first vape after waking. Internal consistency, convergent validity, and concurrent validity of the measures were assessed.

resultsBoth the PS-ECDI and the EDS exhibited a good degree of internal consistency (α = 0.8472 and 0.8405, respectively). All measures exhibited convergent validity against each other and against time to first vape upon waking (p < .001), as well as concurrent validity against vaping frequency and nicotine concentration (p < .001). The PS-ECDI was inferior to the EDS, self-perceived measure, and time from waking when predicting daily vaping frequency, but, along with the self-perceived measure, was superior to the EDS and time from waking when predicting monthly vaping.

conclusionsAll measures exhibit convergent and concurrent validity, as well as internal consistency. Depending on the needs of the study, it would be appropriate to use any of these measures when assessing e-cigarette dependence in adolescent and young-adult populations. IMPLICATIONS: The PS-ECDI and the self-perceived measure are equally effective in predicting monthly vaping, but the self-perceived measure was superior in predicting daily vaping. Thus, the one-item self-perceived measure of dependence is appropriate for use and preferable to the 11-item PS-ECDI or the 4-item EDS in situations of limited time or where subjects are at risk of respondent fatigue, and is superior to time to first vape after waking to predict vaping frequency.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco Use DisorderVapingAdolescentCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNicotineSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID34936704
PMCPMC9200078
OpenAlexW4200247464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.