Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34936234›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2022

Implication of the Nociplastic Features for Clinical Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia: Development of the Preliminary Nociplastic-Based Fibromyalgia Features (NFF) Tool.

Banafsheh Ghavidel-Parsa, Ali Bidari, Zahra Atrkarroushan, Mohammad-Javad Khosousi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions and Nociplastic Pain.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Motor Dysfunctions in Fibromyalgia Patients: The Importance of Breathing.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. What Do We Know about Nociplastic Pain?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Banafsheh Ghavidel-ParsaGuilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-1756
Ali BidariIran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-1838
Zahra AtrkarroushanGuilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mohammad-Javad KhosousiGuilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-8094
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Guilan University of Medical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNociplastic concept incorporates a broad continuum of pain phenotypes shared with clinical peculiarity. This study aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic tool, the preliminary Nociplastic-based Fibromyalgia Features (NFF), to detect fibromyalgia (FM) in patients with chronic pain.

methodsItems requiring yes or no responses and relating to the most relevant clinical nociplastic pain (NP) features of FM were compiled by a group of expert rheumatologists. The provisional list was tested in a prospective study on 185 consecutive patients with chronic pain (126 patients with FM and 59 patients with non-FM non-inflammatory chronic pain) diagnosed based on expert decision. Identification of the most discriminant combinations of items for FM and the calculation of their sensitivity and specificity were based on both univariate and multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) analyses. All participants were investigated through the final NFF, the 2011 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and the 2016 ACR criteria. NFF performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

resultsBased on multivariate analyses, we retained only seven items in the final version of the NFF. A cut-off score of 4 (corresponding to the number of positive items) gave the highest rate of correct identification of patients (85%), with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 91%. The NFF showed the highest concordance rate with expert diagnosis (85%) and the lowest value (77%) with the ACR 2016 criteria.

conclusionThe preliminary NFF with respect to the various aspects of NP showed good performance for detection of the FM in the clinical setting. This tool may provide a more pragmatic approach to the timely diagnosis of FM.

Identifiers

PMID34936234
PMCPMC8916565
OpenAlexW4200512229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.