ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Novel left and right ventricular strain analysis to detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction in cardiac allograft rejection.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Non-Invasive Imaging Technologies in Cardiac Transplant Follow-Up: Acquired Evidence and Future Options.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Role of Left Atrial Longitudinal Strain in the Diagnosis of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplant Recipients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of acute cellular rejection (ACR) by echocardiography shows potential clinical benefit as ACR remains a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. This retrospective, longitudinal study sought to investigate the use of novel left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) strain analysis to detect biopsy proven ACR. 46 heart transplant patients (Mean age 46 ± 16 years) with biopsy proven ACR were grouped according to biopsy results: 1R-ACR (n = 36) and 2R-ACR (n = 10). Serial two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography with strain analysis was performed. Echocardiographic parameters were serially measured: (1) rejection free period (0R-ACR); (2) pre-ACR period (pre-ACR); (3) during ACR (1R-ACR or 2R-ACR) and (4) post-ACR (Post-ACR). Significant reductions for LV Global Longitudinal Strain (LV GLS) and LV Early diastolic Strain rate (LV ESr) were observed between 0R-ACR and pre-ACR (LV GLS 0R-ACR: 17.3% vs Pre-2R ACR: 15.4%, p = 0.016; LV ESr 0R-ACR: 1.00/s vs Pre-2R ACR: 0.74/s, p = 0.007) with LV ESr demonstrating the highest sensitivity (92%) and specificity (81%) to predict ACR. LV ESr and the E/LV ESr ratio were significantly different (p = 0.0001; p = 0.016) during pre-1R ACR period vs 0R whereas LV GLS showed no significant differences for grade 1R-ACR. Diastolic mechanical dispersion showed significant increases in dispersion during ACR for the 1R-ACR group and early significant increases pre-2R ACR. Systolic and diastolic RV strain parameters showed a similar trend for both ACR groups. Systolic and diastolic strain parameters can detect myocardial dysfunction before biopsy confirmed 2R-ACR. Early diastolic strain rate parameters are most sensitive detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction pre-ACR. Novel strain parameters are potentially useful clinical tool for prediction of early ACR in heart transplant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.